Semantic web can be described as Layer Structure. we have URI in the button layer which is the unique identifier for data. and then we hay syntax like : xml, ns and xml xmls next it is the way how can we interpret semantic data : RDF and above RDF, we have RDFs, and OWL is independent from RDFs? but OWL, Dublin Core and FOAF is kind of RDFa? what's the structure between those ?
语义Web可以描述为层结构。我们在按钮层中有URI，它是数据的唯一标识符。然后我们干草语法如下：xml，ns和xml xmls接下来我们如何解释语义数据：RDF和RDF之上，我们有RDF，而OWL独立于RDF？但OWL，都柏林核心和FOAF是一种RDFa？这些之间的结构是什么？
1 个解决方案
#1
10
Dublin Core and FOAF are schemas, i.e. vocabularies you can use to mark up your data.
Dublin Core和FOAF是模式，即可用于标记数据的词汇表。
OWL (and RDFS) are languages for writing new schemas / vocabularies / ontologies. OWL and RDFS schemas are written using RDF.
OWL（和RDFS）是用于编写新模式/词汇表/本体的语言。 OWL和RDFS模式使用RDF编写。
RDFa is a syntax for writing RDF (other examples are RDF/XML and Turtle).
RDFa是编写RDF的语法（其他示例是RDF / XML和Turtle）。
Yes, this is all quite confusing!
是的，这一切都让人很困惑！
#1
10
Dublin Core and FOAF are schemas, i.e. vocabularies you can use to mark up your data.
Dublin Core和FOAF是模式，即可用于标记数据的词汇表。
OWL (and RDFS) are languages for writing new schemas / vocabularies / ontologies. OWL and RDFS schemas are written using RDF.
OWL（和RDFS）是用于编写新模式/词汇表/本体的语言。 OWL和RDFS模式使用RDF编写。
RDFa is a syntax for writing RDF (other examples are RDF/XML and Turtle).
RDFa是编写RDF的语法（其他示例是RDF / XML和Turtle）。
Yes, this is all quite confusing!
是的，这一切都让人很困惑！