Ok, this is a weird issue :
好的,这是一个奇怪的问题:
- I'm using
unsigned long long
variables (I've used evenlong
ones, with the same effect) - I need to be able to store 64-bit integers (
sizeof
returns 8, which is fine)
我正在使用无符号长long变量(我甚至使用了长变量,具有相同的效果)
我需要能够存储64位整数(sizeof返回8,这很好)
However, when I'm trying to go to values like 1<<63
, and perform some simple bitwise operations, I - oddly - seem to be getting negative values. Why's that?
然而,当我试图去像1 << 63这样的值,并执行一些简单的按位运算时,奇怪的是 - 我似乎得到负值。为什么?
My test code :
我的测试代码:
unsigned long long c = 0;
c |= 1l << 56; printf("c = %lld\n",c);
c |= 1l << 63; printf("c = %lld\n",c);
Output :
c = 72057594037927936
c = -9151314442816847872
Sidenotes :
- Of course, same thing happens even if I do
c = 1l<<63
directly. - All tests made on Mac OS X 10.6, and compiled using Apple's LLVM Compiler 3.0
当然,即使我直接做c = 1l << 63,也会发生同样的事情。
所有测试均在Mac OS X 10.6上进行,并使用Apple的LLVM编译器3.0进行编译
Any suggestions?
2 个解决方案
#1
22
The d
part of the %lld
specifier is telling printf
that the argument should be treated as a signed integer. Use a u
instead: %llu
.
%lld说明符的d部分告诉printf该参数应该被视为有符号整数。请改用u:%llu。
From the man pages:
从手册页:
d, i
The int argument is converted to signed decimal notation.
int参数转换为带符号的十进制表示法。
o, u, x, X
o,u,x,X
The unsigned int argument is converted to unsigned octal (o), unsigned decimal (u), or unsigned hexadecimal (x and X) notation.
unsigned int参数转换为无符号八进制(o),无符号十进制(u)或无符号十六进制(x和X)表示法。
#2
4
I think you're actually doing something undefined here. I think the expression 1l << 63
is undefined in C, since the compiler will represent 1l
in a signed type, and shifting by 63 bits causes an signed overflow (which is undefined in C). I'm not an expert, but seems like you want 1ull << 63
.
我想你实际上是在做一些未定义的事情。我认为表达式1l << 63在C中是未定义的,因为编译器将在有符号类型中表示1l,并且移位63位会导致有符号溢出(在C中未定义)。我不是专家,但似乎你想要1个<< 63。
Your original code, in fact, complains about this if you pass -Weverything
in clang:
事实上,你的原始代码如果你传递了一切,就会抱怨这个:
foo.c:7:23: warning: signed shift result (0x8000000000000000) sets the sign bit of the
shift expression's type ('long') and becomes negative [-Wshift-sign-overflow]
c |= 1l << 63; printf("c = %lld\n",c);
~~ ^ ~~
EDIT: And, yes, then you need the correct printf format from the other answer.
编辑:是的,那么你需要从另一个答案正确的printf格式。
#1
22
The d
part of the %lld
specifier is telling printf
that the argument should be treated as a signed integer. Use a u
instead: %llu
.
%lld说明符的d部分告诉printf该参数应该被视为有符号整数。请改用u:%llu。
From the man pages:
从手册页:
d, i
The int argument is converted to signed decimal notation.
int参数转换为带符号的十进制表示法。
o, u, x, X
o,u,x,X
The unsigned int argument is converted to unsigned octal (o), unsigned decimal (u), or unsigned hexadecimal (x and X) notation.
unsigned int参数转换为无符号八进制(o),无符号十进制(u)或无符号十六进制(x和X)表示法。
#2
4
I think you're actually doing something undefined here. I think the expression 1l << 63
is undefined in C, since the compiler will represent 1l
in a signed type, and shifting by 63 bits causes an signed overflow (which is undefined in C). I'm not an expert, but seems like you want 1ull << 63
.
我想你实际上是在做一些未定义的事情。我认为表达式1l << 63在C中是未定义的,因为编译器将在有符号类型中表示1l,并且移位63位会导致有符号溢出(在C中未定义)。我不是专家,但似乎你想要1个<< 63。
Your original code, in fact, complains about this if you pass -Weverything
in clang:
事实上,你的原始代码如果你传递了一切,就会抱怨这个:
foo.c:7:23: warning: signed shift result (0x8000000000000000) sets the sign bit of the
shift expression's type ('long') and becomes negative [-Wshift-sign-overflow]
c |= 1l << 63; printf("c = %lld\n",c);
~~ ^ ~~
EDIT: And, yes, then you need the correct printf format from the other answer.
编辑:是的,那么你需要从另一个答案正确的printf格式。