从C ++ / CLI实现在C＃中声明的接口

Say I have a C# interface called IMyInterface defined as follows:

假设我有一个名为IMyInterface的C#接口,定义如下:

// C# code
public interface IMyInterface
{
  void Foo(string value);
  string MyProperty { get; }
}

Assume I also have a C++/CLI class, MyConcreteClass, that implements this interface and whose header is declared as follows:

假设我还有一个C ++ / CLI类MyConcreteClass,它实现了这个接口,其头部声明如下:

// C++/CLI header file
ref class MyConcreteClass : IMyInterface
{
public:

};

How does one implement the method Foo and the property MyProperty in the C++/CLI header?

如何在C ++ / CLI头中实现方法Foo和属性MyProperty?

My attempt results in the following compile error:

我的尝试导致以下编译错误:

error C3766: 'MyConcreteClass' must provide an implementation for the interface method 'void IMyInterface::Foo(System::String^ value)'

错误C3766:'MyConcreteClass'必须提供接口方法'void IMyInterface :: Foo(System :: String ^ value)'的实现

1 个解决方案

#1

public ref class MyConcreteClass : public IMyInterface
{
 public:
  virtual void __clrcall Foo(String^ value) sealed;  

  virtual property String^ __clrcall MyProperty 
         { String^ get() sealed { String::Empty; } }
};

Interfaces need to be defined as virtual. Also note the "public IMy.." after the class decleration, it's a slighly different syntax than C#.

接口需要定义为虚拟。在课堂变换之后还要注意“公共IMy ..”,它的语法与C#略有不同。

If you can, seal the interface members to improve performance, the compiler will be able to bind these methods more tightly than a typical virtual members.

如果可以,密封接口成员以提高性能,编译器将能够比典型的虚拟成员更紧密地绑定这些方法。

Hope that helps ;)

希望有所帮助;)

I did not compile it but looks good to me... Oh and also, defining your methods as __clrcall eliminates dangers of double thunk performance penalties.

我没有编译它,但对我来说看起来很好......哦,并且,将__clrcall定义为方法可以消除双重性能损失的危险。

edit the correct syntax for a property is:

编辑属性的正确语法是:

public ref class MyConcreteClass : public IMyInterface
{
 public:
  virtual property String^ MyProperty 
  {
    String^ get() sealed { return String::Empty; };
    void set( String^ s ) sealed { };
  }
};

or, when putting the definition in the source file:

或者,当将定义放在源文件中时:

public ref class MyConcreteClass : public IMyInterface
{
 public:
  virtual property String^ MyProperty 
  {
    String^ get() sealed;
    void set( String^ s ) sealed;
  }
};

String^ MyConcreteClass::MyProperty::get()
{
  return String::Empty;
}

void MyConcreteClass::MyProperty::set( String^ )
{
  //...
}

#1

public ref class MyConcreteClass : public IMyInterface
{
 public:
  virtual void __clrcall Foo(String^ value) sealed;  

  virtual property String^ __clrcall MyProperty 
         { String^ get() sealed { String::Empty; } }
};