Mysql读写分离的两种方法对比：Spring+JPA应用层实现 vs Amoeba中间件实现

前段时间看了篇文章，讲Youku网数据库架构的演变，如何从最开始的读写分离，再到垂直分区，最后到水平分片，一步一步慢慢成熟的。看完之后很有冲动抽出一个模型来把这几种技术都实现一下。

     说干就干，首先是读写分离了，我使用的数据库是Mysql，主从数据复制用的是半同步机制(mysql版本必须 5.5以上)，具体配置，可以参照这篇文章： http://blog.csdn.net/changerlove/article/details/6167255， 要注意Windows环境下，mysql配置文件为my.ini, linux下才是my.cnf。

主从复制有两类做法，

1.手动：根据事物类型，来route,应用层动态切换数据源

2.自动：利用中间件自动完成（比如amoeba）在应用层和数据源之间通过分析SQL来Route

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

下面说方法1：

     在例子中有两台Mysql Server，一台Master 负责写，一台Slave负责读，对应的JPA 配置文件如下：

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence version="2.0"
	xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd">

	<!-- used to test R/W Splitting in MYSQL, can be routed by transaction 
		type(read only or not) -->
	<persistence-unit name="MASTER_000" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
		<provider>
            org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider
        </provider>
		<exclude-unlisted-classes>false</exclude-unlisted-classes>
		<properties>
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.driver" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.url" value="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/rws_db" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.user" value="root" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.password" value="" />
			<!-- Minimal connections in internal pool -->
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.read-connections.min"
				value="1" />
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.write-connections.min"
				value="1" />
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.batch-writing" value="JDBC" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.level" value="FINE" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.thread" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.session" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.exceptions" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.timestamp" value="false" />
		</properties>
	</persistence-unit>

	<persistence-unit name="SLAVE_000" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
		<provider>
            org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider
        </provider>
		<exclude-unlisted-classes>false</exclude-unlisted-classes>
		<properties>
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.driver" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.url" value="jdbc:mysql://146.222.51.163:3306/rws_db" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.user" value="zhuga3" />
			<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.password" value="Gmail123" />
			<!-- Minimal connections in internal pool -->
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.read-connections.min"
				value="1" />
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.write-connections.min"
				value="1" />
			<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.batch-writing" value="JDBC" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.level" value="FINE" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.thread" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.session" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.exceptions" value="false" />
			<property name="eclipselink.logging.timestamp" value="false" />
		</properties>
	</persistence-unit>

</persistence>

然后系统的事务控制，这个是关键，因为在事务初始化的时候要根据事务属性(R/W)来初始化对应的EntityManager，并开启事务，为简单起见，例子中利用的都是JPA的Entity Transaction，而不是JTA。

实现第一步，我们得自定义transactionManager来控制事务的开关，回滚以及资源的初始化等等，直接看代码吧：

package util.transaction;
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityTransaction;
import org.springframework.transaction.TransactionDefinition;
import org.springframework.transaction.TransactionException;
import org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager;
import org.springframework.transaction.support.DefaultTransactionStatus;

public class RWSTransactionManager extends AbstractPlatformTransactionManager {

	private static final long serialVersionUID = -1369860968344021154L;

	@Override
	protected Object doGetTransaction() throws TransactionException {
		return new RWSJPATransactionObject();
	}

	@Override
	protected void doBegin(Object txObject, TransactionDefinition definition)
			throws TransactionException {
		RWSJPATransactionObject rwsTransaction = (RWSJPATransactionObject) txObject;
		EntityManager entityManager = EntityManagerHolder.getInstance()
				.initializeResource(definition.isReadOnly());
		EntityTransaction transaction = entityManager.getTransaction();
		rwsTransaction.setTransaction(transaction);

		if (!definition.isReadOnly()) {
			rwsTransaction.getTransaction().begin();
		}
	}

	@Override
	protected void doCommit(DefaultTransactionStatus transactionStatus)
			throws TransactionException {
		if (transactionStatus.isReadOnly()) {
			return;
		}

		RWSJPATransactionObject rwsTransaction = (RWSJPATransactionObject) transactionStatus
				.getTransaction();
		rwsTransaction.getTransaction().commit();
	}

	@Override
	protected void doRollback(DefaultTransactionStatus transactionStatus)
			throws TransactionException {
		if (transactionStatus.isReadOnly()) {
			return;
		}

		RWSJPATransactionObject rwsTransaction = (RWSJPATransactionObject) transactionStatus
				.getTransaction();
		rwsTransaction.getTransaction().rollback();
	}

	private class RWSJPATransactionObject {
		private EntityTransaction transaction;

		public EntityTransaction getTransaction() {
			return transaction;
		}

		public void setTransaction(EntityTransaction transaction) {
			this.transaction = transaction;
		}

		public RWSJPATransactionObject() {
			super();
		}
	}

}

对应的 EntityManagerHolder 代码如下：

package util.transaction;

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Random;
import javax.persistence.EntityManager;
import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory;
import javax.persistence.Persistence;

import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;

public class EntityManagerHolder {

	private Random random = new Random();

	private String PERSISTENCE_UNIT_HEADER_MASTER = "MASTER_";

	private String PERSISTENCE_UNIT_HEADER_SLAVE = "SLAVE_";

	private final ThreadLocal<EntityManager> THREAD_LOCAL = new ThreadLocal<EntityManager>();

	private final Map<String, EntityManagerFactory> RESOURCE = new HashMap<String, EntityManagerFactory>();

	private static EntityManagerHolder emHolder;

	private EntityManagerHolder() {
	}

	public static EntityManagerHolder getInstance() {
		if (null == emHolder) {
			emHolder = new EntityManagerHolder();
		}
		return emHolder;
	}

	EntityManager initializeResource(boolean isReadOnly) {
		// get random persistence unit, dependents on master and slave
		// quantities
		// configured in persistence.xml
		String puSuffix = "";
		if (isReadOnly) {
			puSuffix = StringUtils.leftPad(String.valueOf(random.nextInt(1)),
					3, "0");
		} else {
			puSuffix = StringUtils.leftPad(String.valueOf(random.nextInt(1)),
					3, "0");
		}

		String persistenceUnit = (isReadOnly ? PERSISTENCE_UNIT_HEADER_SLAVE
				: PERSISTENCE_UNIT_HEADER_MASTER) + puSuffix;

		return createEntityManager(persistenceUnit);
	}

	private EntityManager createEntityManager(String persistenceUnit) {
		if (null == RESOURCE.get(persistenceUnit)) {
			EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory = Persistence
					.createEntityManagerFactory(persistenceUnit);
			RESOURCE.put(persistenceUnit, entityManagerFactory);
		}

		EntityManager entityManager = THREAD_LOCAL.get();

		if (null == entityManager || !entityManager.isOpen()) {
			entityManager = RESOURCE.get(persistenceUnit).createEntityManager();
			THREAD_LOCAL.set(entityManager);
		}

		return entityManager;
	}

	public EntityManager getEntityManager() {
		EntityManager entityManager = THREAD_LOCAL.get();
		if (null == entityManager) {
			throw new IllegalArgumentException();
		}
		return entityManager;
	}

	public void closeEntityManager() {
		EntityManager entityManager = THREAD_LOCAL.get();
		THREAD_LOCAL.set(null);
		if (null != entityManager)
			entityManager.close();
	}

}

可以看到，在getTransaction方法里我们简单new了一个自定义的Object，其实就是一个EntityTransaction holder，关键是在begin（..）方法里，首先会根据事务属性到EntityManagerHolder中进行资源初始化（主要是EMFactory和EM）,在initializeResource 方法里面，简单的写了种路由 算法 ，就是Java随机数，生成对应PersistenceUnit Name的后缀，最后根据这个name去生成对应的EMFactory和EM，并且set到Threadlocal的变量中去，之后在Dao层可以直接通过getEntityManager 方法来获取EntityManager.初始化结束之后，对应的事务直接使用EM里面的EntityTransaction来begin，commit和rollback。

事务管理器写好了，我们先看一下事务相关的Spring配置：

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" 
	xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
	http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
	http://www.springframework.org/schema/context 
	http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-2.5.xsd
	http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx
	http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-2.5.xsd">

	<context:annotation-config />
	<context:component-scan base-package="*" />
	
	<bean id="transactionManager" class="util.transaction.RWSTransactionManager"/>
	<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/>
	
</beans>

最后需要在service上配置事务：

	@Override
	@Transactional(readOnly = false)
	public void add(T object) {
		getDao().push(object);
	}

	@Override
	@Transactional(readOnly = true)
	public List<T> findByExample(T object) {
		return getDao().findByExample(object);
	}
	

测试类：

package test;

import service.EmployeeService;
import test.mainTest.BaseMainTest;
import domain.Employee;

public class TestRWS extends BaseMainTest {
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		EmployeeService employeeService = (EmployeeService) ctx
				.getBean("employeeService");
		Employee employee = new Employee();
		employee.setFirstName("Yinkan");
		employee.setLastName("Zhu");

		employeeService.add(employee);
//		employeeService.findByExample(employee);
	}
}

当调用EmployeeService里面的Add方法时（事务属性为写事务），从Log里可以看到成功连接到Master Server，并且插入成功，从库里也同步过去了。

当调用EmployeeService里面的FindByExample方法的时候（事务属性为读事务），从Log里可以看到是从Slave Server读取数据：

到这里第一种方法，在应用层来实现读写分离已经结束了，可以看到，通过事务属性来进行数据源切换这种做法比较简单，但是从软件设计的角度来看，事务控制里面耦合了数据源切换的逻辑，

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

自动读写分离的例子：

下面一种做法，使用Amoeba直接在SQL level做Route，代码的耦合度大大降低，但是也带来了其他问题。

      Amoeba的配置，请参照官方文档： http://docs.hexnova.com/amoeba/

一主多从具体配置，看这里的文章http://blog.csdn.net/lixld/article/details/70144883

      Amoeba的原理如下图所示，就是一层代理，对APP来说可见的只有一个DataSource，具体的Masters和Slaves可以在Amoeba里配置。

          

    对应应用层JPA的配置如下：

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence version="2.0"
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd">

<persistence-unit name="proxyPU" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<provider>
            org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider
        </provider>
<exclude-unlisted-classes>false</exclude-unlisted-classes>
<properties>
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.driver" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" />
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.url" value="jdbc:mysql://localhost:8066/rws_db" />
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.user" value="amoebaUser" />
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.password" value="123" />
<!-- Minimal connections in internal pool -->
<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.read-connections.min"
value="1" />
<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.write-connections.min"
value="1" />
<property name="eclipselink.jdbc.batch-writing" value="JDBC" />
<property name="eclipselink.logging.level" value="FINE" />
<property name="eclipselink.logging.thread" value="false" />
<property name="eclipselink.logging.session" value="false" />
<property name="eclipselink.logging.exceptions" value="false" />
<property name="eclipselink.logging.timestamp" value="false" />
</properties>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>

该PersistenceUnit里面用到的Mysql相关信息，配置在Amoeba的amobe.xml文件里，是一个对外的proxy：

	<!-- service class must implements com.meidusa.amoeba.service.Service -->
		<service name="Amoeba for Mysql" class="com.meidusa.amoeba.net.ServerableConnectionManager">
			<!-- port -->
			<property name="port">8066</property>
			
			<!-- bind ipAddress -->
			<!-- 
			<property name="ipAddress">127.0.0.1</property>
			 -->
			
			<property name="manager">${clientConnectioneManager}</property>
			
			<property name="connectionFactory">
				<bean class="com.meidusa.amoeba.mysql.net.MysqlClientConnectionFactory">
					<property name="sendBufferSize">128</property>
					<property name="receiveBufferSize">64</property>
				</bean>
			</property>
			
			<property name="authenticator">
				<bean class="com.meidusa.amoeba.mysql.server.MysqlClientAuthenticator">
					
					<property name="user">amoebaUser</property>
					
					<property name="password">123</property>
					
					<property name="filter">
						<bean class="com.meidusa.amoeba.server.IPAccessController">
							<property name="ipFile">${amoeba.home}/conf/access_list.conf</property>
						</bean>
					</property>
				</bean>
			</property>
			
		</service>
		

     然后是事务，事务的话可以直接使用Spring自带的JpaTransactionManager来管理，Entitymanager可以在Service层用annotation来注入，具体代码我就不贴了，一切准备好之后先启动Amoeba，我们来跑一下test， 首先是读，发现log如下：

可以看到Database version： 。。mysql-amoeba-proxy。。 说明连接正确，在看结果读数据也的正常的。

接下来就是测试写数据： 跑了一下，报错了：

Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: ResultSet is from UPDATE. No Data.
Error Code: 0
Call: SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID()

Check一下生成的SQL，发现insert之后跑了句SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID()， 因为我程序里Entity的主键是Mysql的自增主键，每次插入都会生成这句话用来返回当前ID，而这个ID是跟着Connection走的，也就是说如果该connection里面没有更新，就拿不到值，可是我们的insert和这句select难道不在一个Connection里面？对的，忘了我们用的是“SQL路由器”吗？

insert语句开启主库connection，

select则走的是从库的connection，所以查询当然是空了，

而天真的eclipselink查出resultSet之后直接.next()了，也没判断是否有值，于是就出现这个error code了，当然对于eclipselink，这种check只是nice to have，正常情况下是不会出现这种情况的，connection在获取数据源的时候就已经有了，这里因为我们拿到的其实是个代理。

考虑到Amoeba的实现原理，即"SQL路由"，即使Mysql支持Oracle一样的主键生成策略，在这种情况下似乎也不能正常工作。所以得由来应用层来生成主键，这又是Effort。。。

另外从Amoeba的文档里看到，他的另一个缺点是目前不支持事务，这个我的理解是通过规则配置

多主情况下，跨connection的事务做不到原子性，也就是不支持JTA。

这么看来Amoeba的使用场景确实有限，

首先domain层最好不要使用JPA之类的ORM框架，纯JDBC开发更可靠。。。然后不支持XA的transaction。

综合对比一下，第一种做法更简单也更放心，第二种做法，还是再议吧。。。