[LeetCode] 99. Recover Binary Search Tree 复原二叉搜索树

时间:2021-01-12 02:56:51

Two elements of a binary search tree (BST) are swapped by mistake.

Recover the tree without changing its structure.

Example 1:

Input: [1,3,null,null,2]

   1
  /
 3
  \
  2 Output: [3,1,null,null,2]   3
  /
 1
  \
  2

Example 2:

Input: [3,1,4,null,null,2]

  3
/ \
1 4
  /
  2 Output: [2,1,4,null,null,3] 2
/ \
1 4
  /
 3

Follow up:

  • A solution using O(n) space is pretty straight forward.
  • Could you devise a constant space solution?

这道题要求我们复原一个二叉搜索树,说是其中有两个的顺序被调换了,题目要求上说 O(n) 的解法很直观,这种解法需要用到递归,用中序遍历树,并将所有节点存到一个一维向量中,把所有节点值存到另一个一维向量中,然后对存节点值的一维向量排序,在将排好的数组按顺序赋给节点。这种最一般的解法可针对任意个数目的节点错乱的情况,这里先贴上此种解法:

解法一:

// O(n) space complexity
class Solution {
public:
void recoverTree(TreeNode* root) {
vector<TreeNode*> list;
vector<int> vals;
inorder(root, list, vals);
sort(vals.begin(), vals.end());
for (int i = ; i < list.size(); ++i) {
list[i]->val = vals[i];
}
}
void inorder(TreeNode* root, vector<TreeNode*>& list, vector<int>& vals) {
if (!root) return;
inorder(root->left, list, vals);
list.push_back(root);
vals.push_back(root->val);
inorder(root->right, list, vals);
}
};

然后博主上网搜了许多其他解法,看到另一种是用双指针来代替一维向量的,但是这种方法用到了递归,也不是 O(1) 空间复杂度的解法,这里需要三个指针,first,second 分别表示第一个和第二个错乱位置的节点,pre 指向当前节点的中序遍历的前一个节点。这里用传统的中序遍历递归来做,不过再应该输出节点值的地方,换成了判断 pre 和当前节点值的大小,如果 pre 的大,若 first 为空,则将 first 指向 pre 指的节点,把 second 指向当前节点。这样中序遍历完整个树,若 first 和 second 都存在,则交换它们的节点值即可。这个算法的空间复杂度仍为 O(n),n为树的高度,参见代码如下:

解法二:

// Still O(n) space complexity
class Solution {
public:
TreeNode *pre = NULL, *first = NULL, *second = NULL;
void recoverTree(TreeNode* root) {
inorder(root);
swap(first->val, second->val);
}
void inorder(TreeNode* root) {
if (!root) return;
inorder(root->left);
if (!pre) pre = root;
else {
if (pre->val > root->val) {
if (!first) first = pre;
second = root;
}
pre = root;
}
inorder(root->right);
}
};

我们其实也可以使用迭代的写法,因为中序遍历 Binary Tree Inorder Traversal 也可以借助栈来实现,原理还是跟前面的相同,记录前一个结点,并和当前结点相比,如果前一个结点值大,那么更新 first 和 second,最后交换 first 和 second 的结点值即可,参见代码如下:

解法三:

// Always O(n) space complexity
class Solution {
public:
void recoverTree(TreeNode* root) {
TreeNode *pre = NULL, *first = NULL, *second = NULL, *p = root;
stack<TreeNode*> st;
while (p || !st.empty()) {
while (p) {
st.push(p);
p = p->left;
}
p = st.top(); st.pop();
if (pre) {
if (pre->val > p->val) {
if (!first) first = pre;
second = p;
}
}
pre = p;
p = p->right;
}
swap(first->val, second->val);
}
};

这道题的真正符合要求的解法应该用的 Morris 遍历,这是一种非递归且不使用栈,空间复杂度为 O(1) 的遍历方法,可参见博主之前的博客 Binary Tree Inorder Traversal,在其基础上做些修改,加入 first, second 和 parent 指针,来比较当前节点值和中序遍历的前一节点值的大小,跟上面递归算法的思路相似,代码如下:

解法四:

// Now O(1) space complexity
class Solution {
public:
void recoverTree(TreeNode* root) {
TreeNode *first = nullptr, *second = nullptr, *cur = root, *pre = nullptr ;
while (cur) {
if (cur->left){
TreeNode *p = cur->left;
while (p->right && p->right != cur) p = p->right;
if (!p->right) {
p->right = cur;
cur = cur->left;
continue;
} else {
p->right = NULL;
}
}
if (pre && cur->val < pre->val){
if (!first) first = pre;
second = cur;
}
pre = cur;
cur = cur->right;
}
swap(first->val, second->val);
}
};

Github 同步地址:

https://github.com/grandyang/leetcode/issues/99

类似题目:

Binary Tree Inorder Traversal

参考资料:

https://leetcode.com/problems/recover-binary-search-tree/

https://leetcode.com/problems/recover-binary-search-tree/discuss/32607/Beat-99-Fast-Java-Solution-O(h)-Space-with-Explanation

https://leetcode.com/problems/recover-binary-search-tree/discuss/32535/No-Fancy-Algorithm-just-Simple-and-Powerful-In-Order-Traversal

https://leetcode.com/problems/recover-binary-search-tree/discuss/32559/Detail-Explain-about-How-Morris-Traversal-Finds-two-Incorrect-Pointer

LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)