Insertion Sort 与 Merge Sort的性能比较(Java)

时间:2023-03-09 00:55:23
Insertion Sort 与 Merge Sort的性能比较(Java)
    public static void main(String[] args)
{
Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = input.nextInt();
int[] a = new int[n]; //生成n个随机数
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
a[i] = (int)(Math.random() * 100); /*long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
InsertionSort(a);
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();*/
//100000个测试数据InsertionSort的排序时间约为2800ms /*System.out.println(Arrays.toString(a));
System.out.println(start);
System.out.println(end);
System.out.printf("The time is: %d", end - start);*/ //获取当前时间(ms)
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
divide(a, 0, a.length - 1);
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
//100000000个测试数据MergeSort的排序时间约为12000ms 10000000个测试数据用时约为1200ms
//相对于平均时间复杂度O(n^2)的插入排序 随着测试数据数量级的增长 性能提升极大 //System.out.println(Arrays.toString(a));
System.out.println(start);
System.out.println(end);
// end - start 即为排序算法运行的时间
System.out.println("The time is: " + (end - start));
} /*public static void InsertionSort(int[] a)
{
for(int i = 1; i < a.length; i++)
{
int key = a[i];
int j;
for(j = i - 1; j >= 0 && key < a[j]; j--)
a[j + 1] = a[j];
a[j + 1] = key;
}
}*/ public static void divide(int[] a, int front, int rear)
{
if(rear <= front)
return; int mid = front + (rear - front) / 2;
divide(a, mid + 1, rear);
divide(a, front, mid);
merge(a, front, mid, rear);
} public static void merge(int[] a, int front, int mid, int rear)
{
int[] b = new int[rear - front + 1];
int i = front, j = mid + 1, k = 0; while(i <= mid && j <= rear)
if(a[i] < a[j])
b[k++] = a[i++];
else
b[k++] = a[j++]; if(i > mid)
while(j <= rear)
b[k++] = a[j++];
else
while(i <= mid)
b[k++] = a[i++]; for(int t = 0, q = front; t < b.length; t++, ++q)
a[q] = b[t];
}